A certain country in South Asia has always wanted to become a world-class power with a voice and color, so it is quite concerned about the special military equipment that can publicly disclose its reality and qualify to enter the club of world-class powers. For example, aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines are the basic types of high-end weapons that world-class navies must possess. Currently, each of the top five countries in the world not only has an aircraft carrier, but also has its own underwater fleet of nuclear submarines. Even some major countries end up with only the shell of an old aircraft carrier, which has been docked in the ice sea near the Arctic Circle for many years. It is said that the maintenance costs have been secretly diverted, but the country's navy will not even announce the retirement of this old aircraft carrier from service. Because if we do this, wouldn't it immediately become a one legged jump among the two essential pillars of a great country's navy? It can be seen that a great power must have both aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines at the same time, which is an unyielding hard law. It is precisely in view of this that the South Asian side has greatly accelerated the speed of its self-produced nuclear submarines, as soon as it has dual aircraft carriers. It is said that many years ago,while the first strategic class nuclear submarine "Destroyer" was launched,

We have started outfitting the second ship of the same type; Even the larger third ship has been discovered by satellites and is now being launched! In this way, the country immediately had three nuclear submarines; By the way, there is also an Akula class nuclear submarine that has been leased for a long time, which gives us two aircraft carriers and four nuclear submarines. At first glance, this lineup looks like a human model G. However, Hanhai Langshan and Xiongnu Langshan believe that even though their country has built its third nuclear submarine, there are still many fundamental issues regarding nuclear submarines that have not been resolved; Is it like starting to build in batches without any consideration? It is truly a similar phenomenon to the superpowers rushing to mass ship the MaFu class nuclear powered aircraft carriers before they have solved the basic technology of electromagnetic launch. So what other basic questions about nuclear submarines are still unclear? It's not complicated either. First of all, the country has not distinguished between attack nuclear submarines and strategic nuclear submarines so far! Because so far, the nuclear submarines of the five major countries in the world have a clear distinction between attack and strategic types, with attack type mainly focusing on attack operations, anti submarine, and anti-ship; The strategic type mainly carries submarine launched intercontinental missiles, which are equipped with nuclear warheads for sea based strategic nuclear deterrence. Although attacking nuclear submarines may also carry a small number of nuclear torpedoes, strategic nuclear submarines themselves also have torpedo launch tubes for self-defense purposes. Previously, there were nuclear submarines carrying a large number of cruise missiles, but they were also classified as tactical submarines rather than strategic boats. However, the J-2 fighter designed and built by South Asia itself seemed to be a strategic boat with a vertical engine from the beginning, and the later J-2 fighter was only a copy of J-1. At the third boat, the size significantly increased, and the number of vertical hair wells seemed to have increased. In this way, the country has continued to build three strategic missile submarines, but has not built any professional attack type nuclear submarines, which is very puzzling.

How to ensure the safety and combat readiness of these so-called strategic boats in such a layout, or how to maintain the underwater fortress launch area? These tasks require more attack type nuclear submarines to perform. In the case of only building strategic boats and not attack boats, should conventional boats or the only leased attack boat be used for execution? It should be noted that conventional boats are simply unable to complete most of the underwater missions of nuclear submarines; And the attack boat rented out will eventually have to be returned. Moreover, there must be a reasonable ratio between nuclear powered attack boats and strategic boats. Usually it's 2-1, with a minimum of 1-1, but now the country has set up a separate 1-3 ratio, which is really puzzling. Taking a step back, perhaps the country's navy wants to tackle the difficulties first and then make it easier, first breaking through the more technically challenging strategic boats, and then turning back to the attack boats in bulk? If that's the case, it can be considered a special approach. But the current problem is that the country's strategic boats themselves are also in a state of chaos. Normally, the entire strategic boat is equipped with a large underwater missile launcher, which houses one large submarine launched intercontinental missile. However, on the Destroyer, the country actually has three missiles inside a launcher. This is truly an unprecedented 'high-tech', and if it were an additional launch of cruise missiles, it would just be enough.And who would have thought that the J-Destroyer was equipped with a fully fledged ballistic missile. Ballistic missiles or three bombs in one pit, what a talent! The problem is that the maximum range of this so-called submarine launched ballistic missile is only a few hundred kilometers.

The minimum range of 6000 kilometers for the most basic submarine launched intercontinental missiles is still 108000 miles away. But the navy of that country has never conducted live fire matching on the Destroyer, even the tank version of the submarine launch test, so such a bizarre missile boat matching is unheard of. If the mismatch between the missile boats is due to the high technology of the strategic boats themselves. So how is the progress on other basic technologies? So far, it's still a mess. For example, there is still no independent heavy torpedo technology, and they are still using imported hydrogen peroxide powered torpedoes. As a result, a few years ago, they first bombed the dock and sank themselves on the Kilo class. Until now, high-pressure gas cylinders with a pressure of 20 megapascals are still used on the Destroyer, which means that none of the three Destroyers have conducted deep diving tests. It is still a mystery how deep they dare to dive.The weapon system and pressure system will be used first. Unexpectedly, even the most basic active and passive sonar system is a half baked product, which caused the J-fighter to directly hit the seabed during its return to port. It is still under continuous maintenance. If you think that this is the end of the matter, then it's not right. There are also major issues with the selection and training of crew members, as there are still crew members who don't know how to close the hatch during the dive. The Destroyer claimed to have been in service for over ten years, but only set sail once in total. The depth of its dive cruise is unknown, and it only hurriedly returned after 20 days of departure. But all of this does not affect the fact that the nuclear submarines in South Asia are getting bigger and bigger. The Destroyer is considered to have a starting weight of 8000 tons, and by the time it reaches the Destroyer 3, it is likely to exceed 13000 tons. Anyway, like those two aircraft carriers, it is a permanent decoration, so it is never wrong to make it bigger!

Source: Military of Strong Countries